×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

CMAR CMGC Question

CMAR CMGC Question

CMAR CMGC Question

(OP)
This may be in the wrong forum, if it would be better off in a different one let me know.

I work for a municipality as a project manager, and we’re looking to build a Rec Center at a cost of $25M to $30M. Here’s question regarding construction contract methods specifically Construction Manager At Risk (CMAR) and Construction Manager-General Contractor (CMGC). After some research, it seems that for a project of this size, either of these methods would be beneficial to us over Design-Bid-Build. It gives us more flexibility in our funding process (always a problem for city projects), and gives as a set price to work against once the contract is signed, the CM being at risk for any overage. The problem is, the city hasn’t used this method before, and is reticent to give it a go. I’ve presented my findings to the purchasing and legal departments, and since they’ve never done it before, they’re dragging their heels; it’s reaching the critical point in the design process where if we don’t get a CM working with the design team soon, we’ll end up going design-bid-build. Anyone know of any seminars/classes on this topic I could send our purchasing/legal people to, in order to get them comfortable with the process?

Another related question: Anyone have any bad experiences with CMAR/CMGC?

RE: CMAR CMGC Question

It's not releated to civil so may not be relevant but look at how some defence contracts in the UK have gone.

The government was keen on fixed price in the late 90s early 2000s and it led to some problems.  I'm thinking the UK Nimrod MR4 upgrade and the SSN program, both with BAES.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close