×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Flare Radiation

Flare Radiation

Flare Radiation

(OP)
Hi Coleages,

I am searching for adecuade emisivity in the radiation
prediction.

API 521 RP use a emisivity of 0,3 but some
article of NAO Co say values of 0,13 maximun
why this diference? whats is the correct emisivity for
a emergency gas with MW = 120

RE: Flare Radiation

A difficult question as it depends on many factors.  The emmissivity of a flare depends not only on the MW (the higher the MW, the higher the emmissivity) but also the material.  For example, paraffins have a lower emissivity than unsaturated HCs.  

Also, the type of flare is a factor.  Sonic type flares are inherently smokeless and thus have a low emissivity.  A conventional flare, especially at low flowing rates if assist gas or steam isn't being used could be very smoky (as the flaring rate increases, the high velocity gas exiting the tip entrains more and more air thus reducing the smoke and its emissivity value even without steam or assist gas though that's not to imply it won't be smoky).

Because of these factors, some companies limit the lower level of the emissivity to ensure that ground level radiation isn't excessive, especially during an upset (eg. steam for the flare tip may be in short supply).  I've seen minimum numbers range from 0.3 to 0.4 explictly stating these limits over-ride vendor's 'expected' performance numbers.

If it was an inherently smokeless design, I'd be willing to go with the vendor's numbers after checking with some users.  If it is a conventional tip, I'd be more concerned.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close