Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Single shell course?

Single shell course?

Single shell course?

I'm reviewing a calculation of an existing vessel that was done in Compress.  The existing vessel has four shell courses.  The designer input the vessel as a single shell course over the OAL of the vessel.

Which is the proper method?  I suspect entering each shell course separately, but I keep talking myself out of it.

Any advice?


RE: Single shell course?

I don't think there's really a "proper" way. Either method can be used. Certainly it's easier to enter only a single cylinder versus worrying about where to located girth seams and multiple sections. There are pro's and con's to each approach. In the end, however, it's probably best to try to spot girth seams at appropriate locations.

ahhh, I just re-read your message. This is an existing vessel so the locations of the seams are known. This changes things a bit.

Remember that in some cases the radiography performed on the circumferential seams may affect the joint efficiency permitted by ASME Code for the longitudinal seam (or seamless vessel section). See rules of UW-12(a) for full RT (and UW-12(d) for seamless) and rule about UW-11(a)(5)(b).

Thus by ignoring the existence of the girth seams an incorrect value for joint efficiency might be applied when determining required thickness based on circumferential stress. Inspection of the data report for actual radiography performed can give some guidance here.

Tom Barsh
Codeware Technical Support

RE: Single shell course?

Hi Tom, thanks for your response.

I have performed my own Compress calculation, and applied the joint efficiency as noted on the U-1 report.  In this case, that happens to be spot radiography for the shell, and 100% radiography for the heads.

Since the locations of the weld seams are known, I have built the model using the four shell courses.  I believe this is more accurate since the circumferential joint efficiency can be applied properly.

I have found other errors in their report, so I will make recommendations accordingly.

Thanks again for your help.


Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


eBook - Rethink Your PLM
A lot has changed since the 90s. You don't surf the Web using dial-up anymore, so why are you still using a legacy PLM solution that's blocking your ability to innovate? To develop and launch products today, you need a flexible, cloud-based PLM, not a solution that's stuck in the past. Download Now
White Paper - Using Virtualization for IVI and AUTOSAR Consolidation on an ECU
Current approaches used to tackle the complexities of a vehicle’s electrical and electronics (E/E) architecture are both cost prohibitive and lacking in performance. Utilizing virtualization in automotive software architecture provides a better approach. This can be achieved by encapsulating different heterogeneous automotive platforms inside virtual machines running on the same hardware. Download Now
White Paper - The Criticality of the E/E Architecture
Modern vehicles are highly sophisticated systems incorporating electrical, electronic, software and mechanical components. Mechanical systems are giving way to advanced software and electronic devices, driving automakers to innovate and differentiate their vehicles via the electric and electronic (E/E) architecture. As the pace of change accelerates, automotive companies need to evolve their development processes to deliver and maximize the value of these architectures. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close