×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Frost protection for foundations on bedrock

Frost protection for foundations on bedrock

Frost protection for foundations on bedrock

(OP)
Do spread footing foundations which bear directly on bedrock (unweathered) need to be extended down to frost depth? Specifically, we have a case where bedrock is, say 24" below grade, and minimum frost depth of 42" below grade. Is it necessary to excavate the rock to achieve the 42"?

RE: Frost protection for foundations on bedrock

The criteria for for setting spread footings below the frost depth relates principally to development of ice lenses within frost succeptible soils. Three conditions are necessary for the formation of significant lenses: A ready supply of moisture; a soil with a relatively high capillary tension capacity (silt) and; a static or slowly advancing freezing front. In the case of a foundation on competent bedrock, logic suggests that there is little potential to develop ice lenses at the interface between the concrete and the rock. If there is some concern on the part of the local building inspector, consider using rock anchors to tie into your new concrete.

RE: Frost protection for foundations on bedrock

(OP)
Thanks for your thoughts, TimC. About the rock anchors, they might make the building official feel better, but I'm wondering about their real ability to restrain frost. It's hard to come by a numerical value for frost heave, but Joseph Bowles gives a value of around 40,000 psf. That would be difficult to resist.

However, it seems logical to me that frost is not an issue in this case.

RE: Frost protection for foundations on bedrock

The comment about using rock anchors was meant to be a means of placating those who might demand that you 'go by the book'. There would effectively be no difference between the rock anchors and dowels at the cold joint between the footer and the poured wall (or pier). Thus, if normal dowels are ok then the rock anchors should be ok too.

RE: Frost protection for foundations on bedrock

It is not uncommon for us in northeastern Ohio to leave footings above conventional frost depth if the rock is sound and massive.  Shales and other laminar rock may not be ok where sound sandstone most likely is.  Positive drainage is always a feel good addition to help assure no readily available water.  Rock type and condition are important factors.

RE: Frost protection for foundations on bedrock

Mdrotar is exactly correct. It is necessary to specifically evaluate the actual nature of the rock formation at those locations where it will support the shallow foundations. It is possible to have a relatively porous rock condition which might permit the penetration of water into the foundation zone, at a shallow depth that would be impacted by the penetration of the freeze line. In that case, you could develop frost heave. Unfortunately, it may not be easy to asess this potential.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - Implementing a Multi-Domain System
IoT systems are multi-domain designs that often require AMS, Digital, RF, photonics and MEMS elements within the system. Tanner EDA provides an integrated, top-down design flow for IoT design that supports all these design domains. Learn more about key solutions that the Tanner design flow offers for successful IoT system design and verification. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close