I have been asked to provide some input on improving efficiency in motor control. Improved motor efficiency is only one part of the equation as most of the energy wastage is in the driven load. Any good ideas or pointers?
Maybe you should forget about your driven load when you first look at this problem - and evaluate the efficiency/complexity/charachteristics of the existing control network and how it was matched to the driven load - once this is known you can then look at improving the control network. Try looking at a software package called Simbol/look up a method called the de Souza method - a simple approach to the design of control networks - and modelling systems. you cannot change the efficiency of the load (if it already exists)- so start looking at the order of the control network once you understand how they were matched originally and how to improve that network.
It will be very hard to improve the efficiency of the electric motors unless you want to spend the bucks to buy super energy-efficient motors. You will have to wait for a time-period payback, which can be good depending on what you are powering. Short term, in-house solutions include power factor correction, precision alignment of components and reducing vibration. Reduce or eliminate steam and air leaks. Infrared analysis and tribology can also benefit, depending on your particular application.
Any driving arrangement for a given load can be looked from three aspects to arrive at the optimal selection of an efficient system - Electrical (motor), electronic (control) and mechanical (transmission between the prime mover and the load). Truly speaking, there is no single system which can be called the best and a combination can be arrived at by studying the application (charecteristics and parameters of driven load)
Electrically, an optimal rating is to be arrived at depending on the load parameters. This would mean matching the prime mover characteristics with load characteristics. The result could be an AC / DC / Servo...
Electronically, the speeds or torque controlling methods (considering feedbacks and tolerences)have to be incorporated in the control scheme resulting in simple V/F, Vector control, analog/digital, servo...with application specific modules.
Mechanically, the losses in the transmissions have to be looked into. This is one aspect that people seem to overlook in most cases. A worm reduction gearbox is a highly inefficient gearbox for large reduction ratios (so much so that in many cases motors are selected more to cover the losses in the gearboxes than to drive the machine) and planetary / hellical gearboxes are much more efficient.
So, invariably it is the overlapping areas of engineering and economics that decide selection of the right combination and this overlapping area would shift from application to application.
Red Flag Submitted
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.
Reply To This Thread
Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.
This brief provides a high level summary of advancements in Mentor’s AMS Verification solutions since we saw you all last year at DAC 2019 in Las Vegas. Products featured: Analog FastSPICE Platform, Symphony Mixed-Signal Platform, Solido Variation Designer, and Solido Characterization Suite. Download Now
This resource will help you find key sessions-panels at DAC from researchers, customers, and our expert technologists; and various resources detailing the recent innovations in HLS, Verification, and RTL Low-Power since DAC 2019. Download Now
Among the challenges in the design flow has been aligning the metrics for design-for-test and for functional safety. This paper describes using logic built-in-self-test as both a functional safety mechanism and as a part of in-system testing, which allows for alignment of metrics required for safety certifications. Download Now
IoT systems are multi-domain designs that often require AMS, Digital, RF, photonics and MEMS elements within the system. Tanner EDA provides an integrated, top-down design flow for IoT design that supports all these design domains. Learn more about key solutions that the Tanner design flow offers for successful IoT system design and verification. Download Now
Talk To Other Members
RE: Efficiency in motor control
RE: Efficiency in motor control
Can you be more specific about what info you want.
RE: Efficiency in motor control
Mark Empson
http://www.lmphotonics.com
RE: Efficiency in motor control
RE: Efficiency in motor control
Electrically, an optimal rating is to be arrived at depending on the load parameters. This would mean matching the prime mover characteristics with load characteristics. The result could be an AC / DC / Servo...
Electronically, the speeds or torque controlling methods (considering feedbacks and tolerences)have to be incorporated in the control scheme resulting in simple V/F, Vector control, analog/digital, servo...with application specific modules.
Mechanically, the losses in the transmissions have to be looked into. This is one aspect that people seem to overlook in most cases. A worm reduction gearbox is a highly inefficient gearbox for large reduction ratios (so much so that in many cases motors are selected more to cover the losses in the gearboxes than to drive the machine) and planetary / hellical gearboxes are much more efficient.
So, invariably it is the overlapping areas of engineering and economics that decide selection of the right combination and this overlapping area would shift from application to application.