The original post presented a question that I too, have had before. I agree with the posters above about the benefits of billing that way as opposed to an hourly rate. I realize that most of what I’m saying may be rather obvious to many folks out there…
To me, the idea of billing using a lump sum is more palatable than billing using an hourly rate, because:
1) You can probably make more,
2) It seems easier, and
3) Is more ethical.
1) As others have mentioned, the hourly rate method may be safer, but more money can actually be made using a lump sum or billing according to the value added.
I find that as I become better at something (and I think most folks are the same when it comes to this), I can do it more quickly AND more accurately. I know what specific problems I'll need to address the moment the field work is finished based on the project. If my billable hours truly reflected this efficiency, I would probably be charging $200 to $300 dollars for a typical geotechnical report (not including field work).
If I actually charged that, at least two things would happen; a) I would be beaten (rightfully so) by my engineer peers because it doesn't reflect the "value added" to the project, and b) I would probably be making $10,000 a year or so.
2) Seems easier: I can't tell you how much valuable time I waste entering time-spent-on-project hours on my excel timesheet everyday. Is that the case with everyone here? Who, truly, uses a stopwatch to accurately record these times either?
If I were on my own, and wanted to make $80,000/year before taxes, why not try to bill out $160,000 (with an assumed multiplier of 2-assuming that's a good multiplier for my circumstances), and then have a goal to try to bring in an average of $3,100 per week throughout the year?
I understand why many companies can't do that; they need the "hours" for each employee for accounting purposes. But on your own, I think timesheets could be optional, which would be a dream come true.
3) Fixed cost billing, in the office, is more ethical: I believe that charging "by the hour" should be avoided where possible. Perhaps it's ok to do when in the field devoted to a project.
Unfortunately, I still need to report "hours" on the timesheet for fixed cost projects so that management is happy and able to conduct their accounting duties. So I enter "hours" that will magically line up with the fixed cost given to the client.
The problem with hourly rates in the office is that they are fictitious hours. I chuckle to myself when I give a document to my manager to review. They review it in front of me for 3 minutes and we talk about it for 5 minutes. I get the weekly hours report and find that they charged an hour to the project for that encounter. Maybe it felt like a lot of work, I don't know. The amount of work you can accomplish in a true hour, uninterrupted, is sometimes staggering.