×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Bi-Axial Bending with no Axial Load

Bi-Axial Bending with no Axial Load

Bi-Axial Bending with no Axial Load

(OP)
Section "H" of the AISC (9th Edition) states that stresses produced from bending about each axes (X-X & Y-Y) AND Axial (Fa) should be checked together with the formulas shown in the section.

My question is, section H says these formulas should be used ONLY if axial load (fa) is present. I have a beam that has bending about both X-X & Y-Y axes at the same time WITHOUT any axial load.

Since the AISC in section "H1" states that these formulas should be used only when Axial load is present do I need to still check bending interaction using these equations and just make Fa = 0 ?  OR do I just check bending about each axis seperately and not worry about interaction?

Thanks,

Jeff
 

RE: Bi-Axial Bending with no Axial Load

Where does section H say that you have to have axial?  I don't see it directly.

section H1 states that for members with BOTH axial and bending, use H1-1 and H1-2.

Then it says that if fa/Fa <= 0.15, you use H1-3.  So with fa = 0, you would use H1-3.

That's how I'd read it.

RE: Bi-Axial Bending with no Axial Load

(OP)
Jae,

It says in the title "Axial Compression and Bending". It also says "Members subject to BOTH Axial & Bending...."


My member is not subjected to any Axial Load. Only Bending in each direction. So section H1 does not apply since my member is not subjected to axial load as the first line suggests.

Jeff

RE: Bi-Axial Bending with no Axial Load

Follow my logic in my first post above....Yes, the title says axial - but for biaxial bending you still use H1-3.

Just pretend you have 1 small little pound of axial compression and your sure to be in conformance.

tongue

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close