×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

A105 and A350 Raw Material

A105 and A350 Raw Material

A105 and A350 Raw Material

(OP)
Could someone please enlighten me how a mill could certify that a material in bar form complies with a forging specification? I've been trying to get a straight answer from our material suppliers, and am not satisfied with what I've been fed. Does ASTM A 961 have the answer?

If a manufacturer machines a part out of a piece of bar that was certified in compliance with A 105 or A 350 LF2, can they claim that the part is machined from a forging?

RE: A105 and A350 Raw Material

A forging specification may impose requirements on raw material to be used for manufacturing forgings.
A part machined from a bar cannot be certified as being machined from a forging. A macrograph of a longitudinal section shows the difference. Forging process should be approved and possibly frozen.

http://www.welding-advisers.com/

RE: A105 and A350 Raw Material

(OP)
OK. Therefore a part machined from "forging stock" could only be allowable (per B16.34) if made from, per A 350 5.3.3, "rolled bar or seamless tubular materials provided that the axial length of the part is approximately parallel to the metal flow lines of the stock." In that case it would be considered a part made from bar rather than from a forging.

I find it interesting that B16.34 allows use of A 105 or A 350 without a reference to the qualifications in those specifications. How else would a manufacturer know that you could not machine a flange from that material? I feel more comfortable specifying complex, pressure-containing parts be made only from A 696 Gr C, than to risk high strains in a weak direction of the raw material.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close