Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

position of accelerometers

position of accelerometers

position of accelerometers

An accelerometer is fit on the bearing housing at an angle of 45 deg to the horizontal plane, and measures an acceleration of 0.3g(rms). How can i calculate the values in horiz. and vertical planes? Further, is there any advantage in mounting the accelerometer in an inclined plane (45deg)?

RE: position of accelerometers


The following website has some information on mounting the accelerometer. I never used the 45* angle method. I machined off the vertical and horizontal plane on the housing and mounted the contacts flush with the surface.

I used these on 1200HP+ dc mill motors though....which gave me good repeatable results. It however, may not be right for you.



RE: position of accelerometers

There's no trigonometric way to divide one reading at 45° into horizontal and vertical components.  I don't believe that there is any advantage to using only sensing in the 45° direction.  More commonly, of course, people use vertical and horizontal as "standard."

regards..  kv

RE: position of accelerometers

I prefer two reading so that one is in load zone

RE: position of accelerometers

Accelerometer mounting in this angle is cheap!  This type of monitoring is requires the actual amplitude to be multiplied by the sin and cos of the 45 degrees which is 0.707.  You will have to take the amplitude reading and multiply it times this value to determine the actual Horizontal (X) and Vertical (Y) values.  I would recommend using an accelerometer in each horizontal or vertical plane to determine the actual vibration.  This application will allow you to determine if the horizontal or vertical position is not performing.  The vertical plane is usually the most rigid for horizontal mounted pumps or similar equipment.

A major turbine manufacturer only has a probe located at the 45 degree plane. This way there are fewer instruments to calibrate and fewer costs.  Again I would recommend using the manufacturers installed instrumentation (i.e. least cost) augmented with your own predictive maintenance program.

RE: position of accelerometers

I agree with the information in the above posts.  However, I have had a few instances of machines that were belt- or gear-driven at angles close to 45°.  On these machines, checking the vibration at the centerline of the load has helped find worn belts, pulleys and gears because the major vibration would show up best in this load direction.
I prefer horizontal and vertical for most applications.  And axial is added for troubleshooting.

RE: position of accelerometers

Just a quick point to note here is that if you have (in the theoretical world) a true harmonic vibration then you will see the same vibration level no matter which radial direction you are taking the measurement.  

However, we know that differing causes of vibration give a resultant that is often direction specific.  As almost everyone here has stated, it is best to take the readings in 2 radial directions but much more important is to be repeatable - make sure you always take the readings at the same place.  Personally, I always try and take one reading in the load zone (thanks Ilangford) and at least one other as close to the perpendicular to the first reading as possible.  

The practice of taking readings at 45' appears to have started with the gas turbine and centrifugal compressor community.  This was done so that true orbits could be taken of the shaft using the built in displacement probes without having to worry about the gravitational effect on the shaft.  This works excellently for checking alignments with vibration as well as looking for shaft whirl, rub or even a rotating stall on a centrifugal compressor element.

My point, Kashnap, is don't worry too much about convention when you are taking readings with a portable vibration analyzer but use your engineering experience and good old common sense.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper - PLM and ERP: Their Respective Roles in Modern Manufacturing
Leading manufacturers are aligning their people, processes, and tools from initial product ideation through to field service. They do so by providing access to product and enterprise data in the context of each person’s domain expertise. However, it can be complicated and costly to unite engineering with the factory and supply chain. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close