Clegg Hammer
Clegg Hammer
(OP)
Does anyone have any experience using a clegg hammer to obtain CBR results? What are its limitations and how does it compare to a traditional CBR setup? Is there a direct correlation between CBR setup and Clegg hammer?? Any help appreciated.





RE: Clegg Hammer
I guess the first question should be why are you wanting to use a Clegg hammer to determine CBR?
The best documented method I am aware of where a hammer type arrangement is used to 'assess equivalent CBR values' is using the TRRL Lightweight Dynamic Probe. This does allow an evaluation of the CBR with depth as a profile, and if this is the kind of assessment you are looking to make, I would suggest that short of actually doing the 'true CBR' test this would be the preferable option.
RE: Clegg Hammer
A search of the internet will usually produce several correlations on soils from different parts of the world, some with slightly different results. However conversion factors are likely to be very close to the original value of:
Equivalent % CBR = 0.07(IVxIV)
I have successfully correlated the Clegg/Lab CBR for Tropical Residual Soils over a wide range of values, from below 10% to 50% CBR.
The Clegg is the perfect tool for site if you want to identify soft areas of fill. A useful reference document for control of fill by the Clegg is ASTM D5874-95.
RE: Clegg Hammer
I can say there is increased interest in a direct readout feature that converts the Clegg Impact Value reading (IV) to %CBR. We are regularly providing instruments that do this now - the LCD display shows %CBR 2 seconds after the IV is displayed. This isn't meant to sound like an advert but only to help answer your question.
Thank you and regards,
Simon Deakin
RE: Clegg Hammer
RE: Clegg Hammer