according to UK Building Regs. Building over 5 storeys must be designed for disproportinate collapse. We are designing a 5 storey structure ( 1 is basement) but are thinking of designing the basement as contiguous piled wall with transfer deck and load bearing masonary above. Because we have 4 storeys of brickwork would we still need to design for disproportionate collapse.
Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
Disproportionate Collapse 1
- Thread starter pie
- Start date
Whether the regulations require it or not any structure should be designed to avoid disproportionate collapse. All it means is that there should be some redundancy in the system. E.g. if one column collapses the whole building should not fall down because the next one falls down and so on. Carl Bauer
-
1
- #3
To answer pie's question - yes, the whole of a five-storey building needs to be designed against progressive collapse to comply with British Building Regs. This means that if you were thinking of loadbearing masonry carrying ordinary prestressed concrete planks, that probably won't do. You would need continuity in the floor plate to bridge a missing wall (by catenery or diaphragm action), or some complicated system of secondary beams and posts to do a similar job. Much better to have a framed structure
On Carl's wider point, where should we be drawing the line? Most people would agree there's no need to consider progressive collapse for a two or three storey domestic building, and at the moment British Regs require it for five or more storeys. Progressive collapse got a lot of press in the wake of September 11, but I'm not convinced it was a real issue. After all, the towers DID stand up for quite a while after the attack.
Richard
On Carl's wider point, where should we be drawing the line? Most people would agree there's no need to consider progressive collapse for a two or three storey domestic building, and at the moment British Regs require it for five or more storeys. Progressive collapse got a lot of press in the wake of September 11, but I'm not convinced it was a real issue. After all, the towers DID stand up for quite a while after the attack.
Richard
I agree that the structure should be checked for disproportionate collapse as per the regulations. However, even though some may argue that this is actually a four storey structure, the designer should really consider the use of the building and the likely effect on the occupants of a partial collapse (whether 5 storeys or not). If there are likely to be large numbers of people in the structure then this check may be prudent on structures with fewer than 5 floors
Andy Machon
Andy Machon
- Status
Similar threads
