×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Disproportionate Collapse

Disproportionate Collapse

Disproportionate Collapse

(OP)
according to UK Building Regs. Building over 5 storeys must be designed for disproportinate collapse. We are designing a 5 storey structure ( 1 is basement) but are thinking of designing the basement as contiguous piled wall with transfer deck and load bearing masonary above. Because we have 4 storeys of brickwork would we still need to design for disproportionate collapse.

RE: Disproportionate Collapse

Whether the regulations require it or not any structure should be designed to avoid disproportionate collapse. All it means is that there should be some redundancy in the system. E.g. if one column collapses the whole building should not fall down because the next one falls down and so on.

Carl Bauer
www.bauerconsultbotswana.com

RE: Disproportionate Collapse

To answer pie's question - yes, the whole of a five-storey building needs to be designed against progressive collapse to comply with British Building Regs.  This means that if you were thinking of loadbearing masonry carrying ordinary prestressed concrete planks, that probably won't do.  You would need continuity in the floor plate to bridge a missing wall (by catenery or diaphragm action), or some complicated system of secondary beams and posts to do a similar job.  Much better to have a framed structure

On Carl's wider point, where should we be drawing the line?  Most people would agree there's no need to consider progressive collapse for a two or three storey domestic building, and at the moment British Regs require it for five or more storeys.  Progressive collapse got a lot of press in the wake of September 11, but I'm not convinced it was a real issue.  After all, the towers DID stand up for quite a while after the attack.

Richard

RE: Disproportionate Collapse

WTC did stand up maybe even more than what would have been forecasted given the fire protection embedded.

RE: Disproportionate Collapse

I agree that the structure should be checked for disproportionate collapse as per the regulations.  However, even though some may argue that this is actually a four storey structure, the designer should really consider the use of the building and the likely effect on the occupants of a partial collapse (whether 5 storeys or not).  If there are likely to be large numbers of people in the structure then this check may be prudent on structures with fewer than 5 floors

Andy Machon

 
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close