Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

ASTM D695 vs D6641 Composites Compressive Test

ASTM D695 vs D6641 Composites Compressive Test

ASTM D695 vs D6641 Composites Compressive Test

We were interested in acquiring test fixtures to determine compressive properties of polymer matrix composites, and currently, two different standards have been brought to our attention.

ASTM D695/ Sacma 1R-94 and ASTM D6641-01.  The advantage of D6641 is that the fixture specific to this test does not require tabbed specimens for strength tests, a potential time saver.  Are there any drawbacks or limitations that I am not aware of with D6641? Does anyone have any additional information in comparison to D695?

Also, which standard is more widely accepted in the industry?

Thank you

RE: ASTM D695 vs D6641 Composites Compressive Test

More info on the D6641 test method is in a FAA report, DOT/FAA/AR-00/26, "Verification of the Combined Load
Compression (CLC) Test Method" (at one time you could download FAA Tech Center reports at actlibrary.tc.faa.gov.

The SRM1 method (a highly modified version of the D695 method) has been used in indsutry for a long time.  Unfortunately it is prone to high variability unless extreme care is taken in specimen preparation and testing.  The ASTM D30 Committee on Composites strongly recommends the use of the D6641 method as it has been shown to have less variability and doesn't require tabs. The only drawback is that it is not recommended for testing [0] layups of unidirectional carbon tape (though it is really no worse than the SRM1 method for uni tape).

The standard D695 test method is designed for unreinforced plastics and should never be used for fiber reinfordced composites.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close