×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

long term strength in clay

long term strength in clay

long term strength in clay

(OP)
I have heard a lot of opinions on the residual strenght of clay in slope stability problems.  Some say only to used the friction angle of the clay for over the long tern because the cohesion element becomes 0
I have tri axial CU tests showing 10 deg friction and 1000 psf cohesion.  I wanted some others coments on wheather you think neglecting the cohesion is overly conservative.  If I neglect the cohesion the slope will have to be constructed out of other material or heavely reinforced.  If I use cohesion the slope is perfectly stable.

RE: long term strength in clay

I would tend to think effectively c=0 be overly conservative. On the one hand I have seen examples in book by the head of geotechnical studides in the civil eng school in Madrid in the 30's considering some cohesion; as well, almost every book has a table for the case with cohesion, which should not be the case if proper would be never considering some to stand. I would say that for generic cases reducing cohesion to one half the engineering safe value should be enough. One can as well think that as soon as the soil gets clayey enough, permeability is greatly reduced, so the main concern is not to allow any separable (from a cohesionless inset) wedge to fail...what will be uncommon if the soil is clayey and homogeneous due to the scarce surface permeability (ensure all water will go quickly drained, if necessary by the same surface). OK, longterm all will be flate (till meteorits come)...but, what is the frequncy of a rainstrom so savage as to undermine the whole cohesion of your site? I think you can count reasonably with some cohesion standing. Of course planting will help the absorption of what rained increasing one formerly dry status for another storm.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close