×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
• Talk With Other Members
• Be Notified Of Responses
• Keyword Search
Favorite Forums
• Automated Signatures
• Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

#### Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

# Testing Method

 Forum Search FAQs Links MVPs

## Testing Method

(OP)
Hi All,

I'm working DOE project on leak test and tranfer the product to factory. We facing high leak failure due to design issue. Meanwhile waiting for new design change , the management want to increase the spec so that we have alot of passes. My question is as follows:-

Is there any statistical method that I can use instead of increase the spec.
I want to test the product using original spec vs increase spec. Is that method can tell us something?

Balan.G

### RE: Testing Method

Before condemning management for "changing the spec", do you understand the details of why the spec was set where it was?  Obviously, changing the spec just to arbitrarily inflate the passing results will undermind the entire purpose of measuring the value.  However, if the current spec limit has no emperical basis, then perhaps they are simply adjusting the limits to remove unnecassry part rejection (alpha rejection).  Here is an example:

I am a pencil manufacturer, and I need to make pencils that are 8 inches in length.  One of my final inpsection items is to measure the overall length of the product.  However, I defined the length to be 8.000 +/- 0.001" .  This implies that I need a piece of measurming equipment that has at least 0.0001" precision.  That means I need to use a Coordinate Measurement Machine (CMM) to measure the LENGTH OF A PENCIL.  Doesn't this seem like overkill?  Perhaps, it makes more sense to define the length to be 8.0 +/- 0.1".  This will allow me to use a digital caliper to measure the value.  Furthermore, there is no real benefit to have a pencil that is guarenteed to be 8.000" when a pencil that is 8.1" will function just as well.

I don't know the specifics of your scenario, however, is it possible that they are simply redefining the length of the pencil to something more realistic?  Do the current test limits guarentees that functionality of the end product is met?

#### Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

#### Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

#### Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login

Close Box

# Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

• Talk To Other Members
• Notification Of Responses To Questions
• Favorite Forums One Click Access
• Keyword Search Of All Posts, And More...

Register now while it's still free!