×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Viscous Heating Problem (reality check)

Viscous Heating Problem (reality check)

Viscous Heating Problem (reality check)

(OP)
I have been trying to solve several viscous heating problems using a CFD tool.  I do not have a lot of wind tunnel experience and therefore do not have any way to “litmus check” the results I have been getting so far.  The idea is to prove that one shape is better than another with respect to the skin heating.  The only formula I have found so far from Frank Whites text is

taw = tinf + rc*uinf^2/(2*c)  

taw: adiabatic wall temp
tinf: free stream static temperature of the air
rc: recovery factor ~ Pr^.333 (for turbulent flow)
uinf: free stream speed of the air
c: specific heat of air

This however is only good for Prandlt numbers of 1 and it does not consider the local Mach numbers or the viscosity changes.  I’m really only in the transonic range ~.8 Mach.  

1] Does anyone have a rule of thumb calculation so that I can build some confidence in the CFD results.

2] or does anyone have empirical experience of what the ballpark temperature rise would be due to viscous heating for Mach .8, Total Temp 49°C airflow.  I’m getting a 7°C rise where as the above equation would indicate a 36°C rise.

Thanks MD
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

RE: Viscous Heating Problem (reality check)

This site shows one way to do it, which is finding the total temperature giving the SAT or OAT. It is the stagnation temperature on the leading edges (dry), and would not be the same for other parts of aircraft.
http://web.mit.edu/16.unified/www/FALL/thermodynamics/chapter_6_files/chapter_6_PRS_Questions/Q6.11.html
http://mtp.jpl.nasa.gov/notes/sat/sat.html
TT/T = 1+ (?-1)/2*M^2.
Where TT = Total temperature, TS = SAT or OAT, M = Mach number
If you use ? = 1.4 for air, the formula simplifies to:
TT  = T * (1+.2* M^2)
I get a ram rise of 36 with a TT of 49°C (322.15K) with the formula of
TS = TT/(1+.2*M^2)    322.15/(1+.2*.8^2) = 285.6 (12.45°C ), 49-12.45 = 36.55°C


Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close