Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Industrial CO2 Lasers. RF vs DC.

Industrial CO2 Lasers. RF vs DC.

Industrial CO2 Lasers. RF vs DC.

Has anyone experience of recent DC and RF resonators in sheet metal cutting applications?

I've used RF lasers in the past but for our next machine I have selected a DC laser, largely for reasons of purchase cost and better service coverage. From my point of view as long as I get power and an acceptable level of control frm the machine the method of excitation in the resonator is irrelevant. I'd be interested, without starting a religious war, if anyone had positive or negative experience with either technology.


Rev Doh'd

RE: Industrial CO2 Lasers. RF vs DC.

pardon my ignorance.  i have worked with a co2 laser for many years, but i don't recall the terms rf and dc.  please clarify for my own education.

RE: Industrial CO2 Lasers. RF vs DC.

I'm no expert in this field but the following is I believe a suitably accurate over simplification.

Industrial CO2 resonators employ one of two basic methods of excitation of the lasing gases. Either a high DC voltage (8kV~20kV) passed between a cathode and anode in the resonator glassware or a radio frequency (RF) applied across two electrodes usually located outside the glassware.
RF has some advantages for low power control, less contamination of glassware and lower voltages. DC has the advantage that the electronics are simpler and more reliable and they generally cost less.

As I said in my original post as far as I can tell this is somewhere between a holy and marketing war. Currently companies such as Trumpf and LVD (Fanuc) use RF lasers, Bystronic and Prima (PRC) use DC.

RE: Industrial CO2 Lasers. RF vs DC.

i feel better.  that's what i thought dc and rf stood for.  however i have not heard of an industrial grade laser utilizing rf for laser excitation.  i knew it was theoretically possible.  is the effeciency higher for rf?  dc munches a lot of power.

RE: Industrial CO2 Lasers. RF vs DC.

RF stands for radio frequency and Dc means direct current.
the electrical excitation of the laser medium i.e the gas mixture (CO2, N2 & He)is done by RF or DC. Both have merits and demerits. As far as the user is concerned, it matters in the efficiency of the machine only, since DC excitation consumes lot of power because of the use of ballast resistances whereas RF is not. since the output power of the laser matters to the user as well as the application, you need not worry about the RF or DC.But, in general RF excited lasers are currently marketed everywhere.

Hope this would suffice to your doubts.

RE: Industrial CO2 Lasers. RF vs DC.

It is very simple RF lasers has positive dinamic resistance
DC has negative

DC has high constant power and bad short poulse preformance
RF has 5% less but good short poulse preformance

RE: Industrial CO2 Lasers. RF vs DC.


RE: Industrial CO2 Lasers. RF vs DC.

Following up my original post with a few notes, these are my observations based on my experience of RF and now DC laser in the last four years.

I've found the low power control of the DC to be poorer than that on the RF laser I've used in the past. This is only noticeable in extreme fine profiles and switching rapidly from etching to cutting.

The CO2 laser seems to use slightly more resonator gasses than the RF machine, but this may be a feature of the way we are running the machine.

The stability of the cut on the CO2 laser is better particularly at the limits of the machines capability. I've found it possible to obtain a good cut in most cases cutting Zintec material with O2 at speeds I couldn;t have achieved on the RF machine I used previously. As we cut a lot of Zintec this has proved to be a great saving.

Thats after six months, and apart from these notes I haven't found many real differences. If this thread is still around in anotehr six months I'll post an update.

RE: Industrial CO2 Lasers. RF vs DC.

What about at high wattages?  say 5kw or 6kw are there differences in the benefits of RF and DC?  I assume from the power stand point the DC is still better and usually with 5 or 6 no one needs to control the power down to 10% of teh 5 or 6.  I would guess though gas consumption becomes a problem.

RE: Industrial CO2 Lasers. RF vs DC.

When you put more current into your DC-Tube, it will tend to arc instead of maintaining the desired glow discharge.
With RF you can have a higher Powerinput/Volume but with less efficency than the DC-Tube==> RF-Tubes can be smaller.
when the spacing between the electrodes is small,it is possible to cool the electrodes with water and the heat is removed from the gas just by heat-conduction, => you need >>MHz. This goes up to 100W sealed system waveguide laser.
 for normal discharge Tubes with fast gas flow, you can use ~13MHz. I don't remember the industrial-band frequencies at the moment...
DC-Tubes have electrodes inside which sputter metall and cover the tube.  => maintainance required.
RF-Systems feed the power "evenly" distributed into the discharge-tube and there are no electrodes inside.

If you want to cut, then you will need a small focal spot DC/RF is up to you...

RE: Industrial CO2 Lasers. RF vs DC.

unless you intend to design and build a laser, you really need to just research the units commercially available.

There are good RF units available (1kw to 4kw for sure) and good DC units (to 6kw+)

for power level, it depends on what you mean by "sheet metal". If you will integrate your own machine, pay HUGE attention to power control, pierce routines, cutting parameter control, gas switching and pressure control, beam stability, consistancy of beam size at the focus lens, etc, etc.

look at published power consumption, gas consumption, etc.
cost of resonator gas is trivial compared to everything else!

look at service and parts support from the vendor(s)

let us know how you make out

(at Amada America, Inc)

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close