Sam654
Mechanical
- Dec 7, 2007
- 37
My background is with operation and maintenance of utility systems in the chemmical processing industry, primarily oil and Nat Gas fired with some waste fuels, mostly positive pressure boilers. I've recently changed jobs acting as a contractor managing the operation of a wood fired boiler system (among other systems) that utilizes 200 psi steam directly injected into a hot water system (cascade heaters) that provides domestic heating and hot water to a large installation. The boiler has a wet scrubber system whose performace parameters are monitored by the state EPD. The boiler was restarted ~ 2 years ago after several years of shutdown for retubing and scrubber installation. I have two natural gas boilers that are rarely run due to fuel cost (wood chips are free).
Over the years as new buildings have been built, they were designed with stand alone systems with each building. As a result, the steam demand of the boiler has significantly reduced. The boiler is rated for 100K #/hr and is currently running (barely) at ~10k (15% O2, 1200+ ppm CO). I'm being pressured (but resisting) to decrease air for "more efficient operation". I drop air and combustibles shoot up. That also doesn't help the BOD loading to the WWTP from the scrubber. I have several concerns with operations at this low load.
1. Boiler operations - The facility owners (local govt) are extremely cost conscious. They want to decrease the pressure on the boiler to <15 psi, essentially making it a large hot water heater. To the boiler designers out there, is this a concern with natural circulation? I'm concerned already with circulation at these low loads. Will lowering pressure help or hinder circulation?
2. Sootblowing - With oil fired boilers, I typically had operators raise the firing rate to around 50% to ensure soot was carried through the boiler. I cannot raise load this high on this boiler. Is this boiler being set up for a potential explosion? Again, I'm not as familiar with wood firing vs. fossil fuels.
3. Boiler performance - Prior to my arrival, they had an inverter installed on the ID fan which helped with scrubber performance however, focus is more on diff. press. across the scubber than maintaining a negative pressure on the furnace. Again, not the best way to operate in my opinion.
There is consideration of smaller boilers but, they would be ~2 years away if started now. In my opinion, the system needs a complete redesign or we may end up on the evening news. Comments on my concerns? Agree or disagree? Can anyone provide me with more ammunition for my arguement? As a note, my predecessors were less than successful.
Over the years as new buildings have been built, they were designed with stand alone systems with each building. As a result, the steam demand of the boiler has significantly reduced. The boiler is rated for 100K #/hr and is currently running (barely) at ~10k (15% O2, 1200+ ppm CO). I'm being pressured (but resisting) to decrease air for "more efficient operation". I drop air and combustibles shoot up. That also doesn't help the BOD loading to the WWTP from the scrubber. I have several concerns with operations at this low load.
1. Boiler operations - The facility owners (local govt) are extremely cost conscious. They want to decrease the pressure on the boiler to <15 psi, essentially making it a large hot water heater. To the boiler designers out there, is this a concern with natural circulation? I'm concerned already with circulation at these low loads. Will lowering pressure help or hinder circulation?
2. Sootblowing - With oil fired boilers, I typically had operators raise the firing rate to around 50% to ensure soot was carried through the boiler. I cannot raise load this high on this boiler. Is this boiler being set up for a potential explosion? Again, I'm not as familiar with wood firing vs. fossil fuels.
3. Boiler performance - Prior to my arrival, they had an inverter installed on the ID fan which helped with scrubber performance however, focus is more on diff. press. across the scubber than maintaining a negative pressure on the furnace. Again, not the best way to operate in my opinion.
There is consideration of smaller boilers but, they would be ~2 years away if started now. In my opinion, the system needs a complete redesign or we may end up on the evening news. Comments on my concerns? Agree or disagree? Can anyone provide me with more ammunition for my arguement? As a note, my predecessors were less than successful.