Well, yeah, seriously, sometime it just is too windy.
There are several defenses against that, but when your defense mechanism (braking, feathering, yawing, whatever) fails, progressive failure ending in total loss happens often enough to get some bad press.
Part of the problem, if you see the bad press as a problem, is lack of defense in depth. I.e., it appears to be customary to provide only one defense mechanism against overspeed.
Maybe at some level it makes economic sense. Since civilians are rarely present, collateral damage potential is limited to a value known at build time, so it may be cheaper to risk loss of the entire structure than to build in redundant overspeed protections or structure able to survive a blade loss. I'm not privy to any such calculations, but I'm speculating that they could exist.
Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA