Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations JStephen on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Which stress (derived from Frequency Response Analysis) is relevant for fatigue life?

Status
Not open for further replies.

fabs84

Automotive
Joined
Oct 11, 2012
Messages
1
Location
IT
Hi,
in the case of mechanical components which always work at high temperature (metal sheets) I calculate first the stress induced by thermal expansion (thermostructural analysis) and then the one induced by vibrations (frequency response analysis). Finally I use the Haigh Diagram to verify the fatigue failure: Mean stress is the Von Mises stress derived from thermostructural analysis, instead Range stress is the Max Principal stress derived from frequency response analsysis.

Is correct to consider Max Principal stress for the Range stress?
Both Von Mises and Max Principal are non-sinusoidal and vary in the period.

Best regards
 
does seem odd to use principal for one and von Mises for the other.

why not the same for both ? i'd have a personal preference for principal, maybe run the calc with both as see the difference ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top