You should define 'Marine environment'. Is it for components
above water, but in a salt laden atmosphere, or is it for
components which are subject to alternate wetting and drying,
like tidal/splash zone, or for components permanently
submerged in water?
I would be skeptical about using epoxy coated rebars in any
marine environment. There have been a number of publications
regarding the long term performance of ECR bars, and recent
evidence is not in favour of ECR bars in marine environment,
specifically if there is water ingress. Water can permeate thru
the epoxy, with the result that the bond between steel
and epoxy is lost over time, and that is very serious. Further,
strict quality control is required to avoid damages to coating
at various stages. It could be more of a pain than a boon!
The basic requirements for concrete for marine environment
are:
1. Higher grade: say 40 Mpa
2. Maximum water/ cementitious material ratio < 0.4
3. Minimum cementitious material > 350 kg/m^3
4. Use of blast furnace slag or fly ash or other pozzolana -
Pozzolana should be tested to be suitable for the environment
This addition results in a less permeable concrete at a
reduced consumption of cement.
5. Clear cover to reinforcement 50mm for beams, and
75 mm for piles, drilled shafts, portions in water/soil
6. Limit on maximum stress in reinforcement under "normal"
conditions, i.e. excluding extreme environmental
conditions. If the code specifies any limits on crack width,
it should be met.
7. In some areas protective coatings on concrete surface are
provided. This is inspectable and maintainable, unlike
coatings on rebars.
Anything above this should be evaluated for cost- benefits.
Discussion on the above would be welcome!
Hariharan