When I was a kid, (16 yr old engineering intern) one of my duties was to run around to industrial facilities who used an inordinately large amount of water for their products. (think Soda Bottling Company) They had meters of domestic water used for their product, and we read the meters, did an analysis, and filed the difference between their water meter and their product usage with the water company, to base their sewer bill on.
This:
the 25% difference seems a bit high - unless it is just being conservative for the sake of design - which makes sense to me.
..seems backwards to me. The more conservative thing to do, when designing sewers, is to assume the sewer is closer to the water usage, not lower than the water usage.
Regardless, I think we need to understand what sort of study your colleague is trying to put together. In my experience, when you're designing sewer, you design it for a load that's based on usage, and your sewer company or municipality gives you a table to go off of to determine load. For small commercial it's usually based on square feet, unless it's a restaurant, in which case it's based on tables. Residential is based on beds, etc. Then you design around that standard sewer load instead of manufacturing your own load to design for.
On a couple of rare occasions I've worked for very sophisticated retail clients who had years worth of water metering data, and we would derive our own loads for their projects based on their metering data instead of using the community standard. Each of these designs had to be walked through with the municipal reviewer though, and they had to buy in to what we were selling. I do not recall "reducing" their water metering load by a fraction for sewer, though, because their data alone was lower than the community standard, so we didn't want to push it.
Hope this is helpful.
Hydrology, Drainage Analysis, Flood Studies, and Complex Stormwater Litigation for Atlanta and the South East -