Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Vibe Input, Random or Sine?

Status
Not open for further replies.

TomFin

Mechanical
Jun 21, 2006
79

The following vibration spec came across my desk almost on a cocktail napkin.

Vibration/ Shock Spec:
Frequency Range: 10Hz to 40Hz; amplitude = 0.1” p-p
40Hz to 2000Hz; acceleration = 4g RMS
Frequency Period: 30 minutes; 10Hz to 2000Hz and return
Test Time: 3 hours per axis


My job is to work with a test house to carryout this test. I’m assuming this is not a Random Vibe Test as the Amplitude is not specified in g^2/Hz, am I correct?

Thank you in advance for any advice.
-Tom


Failure is a prerequisite of successful design
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

"30 minutes; 10Hz to 2000Hz and return"

sounds like poorly defined swept sine to me.

better go and ask them what they really want!

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376
 
If it is random vib, be safe and just ask for the break point table.

Tobalcane
"If you avoid failure, you also avoid success."
“Luck is where preparation meets opportunity”
 
This is a situation where the customer did not require a spec, but the sales engineer wanted some piece of mind that the product would endure application environment. This aforementioned vibe spec is a spec that he used a while back to test another product for a seperate,but similar type of customer (heavy outdoor vehicle equipment e.g cranes).

With the minimal experience/knowledge I have of vibration testing I would agree with GregLocock and figured that it was a Sine Sweep from this part of the spec:
"Frequency Period: 30 minutes; 10Hz to 2000Hz and return", Random vibe excites all frequencies at once, right?

"40Hz to 2000Hz; acceleration = 4g RMS"
Are the amplitudes of Sine Sweeps typically given in g RMS?



Failure is a prerequisite of successful design
 
We see a lot of questions like this here and I just don't get it. If the spec is ambiguous then do a sanity check yourself (just to make sure you aren't being stupid), ask a colleague to do the same (or ask here if there is no-one else); then go back to the specifier and get clarification.

Simples

M.

--
Dr Michael F Platten
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor