Haha, sorry I left that on my dresser this morning.
Some general comments for op:
My understanding is that if you are only interested in testing motors directly from the terminals, vlf offers very little benefit over power-frequency power-factor/tan-delta/doble testing.
The only advantage comes when testing through a cable:
The new-age cable engineers won't allow dc testing for many cable types due to concerns about aging the cable.
Most ac power-frequency testers would struggle to provide charging current for a long run of cable.
The vlf is similar to the power frequency ac tan delta test, except with lower frequency that charging current requirement is significantly reduced.
I skimmed the first EPRI document, not enough to fully understand it or make a judgement on the technology. There are a variety of tests done for eleven medium voltage motors.
They compared results from dc testing to vlf testing, and also compared testing at motor terminals to testing through shielded cable or unshielded cables, depending on the power system configuration for each motor.
The vlf test in addition to giving tan delta at various voltage steps (and tipup) gives something called "variability" or "% standard deviation" which I gather measures the behavior within a 2-minute constant-voltage step.
=====================================
(2B)+(2B)' ?