Acerians , please accept these comments as a desire to help, rather than outright criticisms which I am sure they will appear to be. You appear to be in well over your head, and the answers to your general questions are well beyond what could be supplied in a forum like this. Your reference to project elevation above sea level is irrelevant unless you are close to the shore, and if so this is an important detail. The fact that the mode of excavation is being reconsidered is probably a positive........ some members of your team are starting to comprehend the scope of this project. I have driven tunnels in relatively competant ground , at moderate size , with 100 gallons per minute inflow, but I were trying to do full face at 20 metres wide, in poor ground , I would be horrified at the thought of even 5 gallons per minute. NATM has a number of variations and I suggest you really need the advice of competant geotechnical engineers, who have tunnelling experience, and provide them with ALL the facts rather than the selective dissemination that appears on this thread. This project appears to be one of those "pay me now, or pay me later" jobs and I predict that your existing budgets are nowhere near adequate to cover the required engineering , test holing and possible grouting after evaluation of the test results.. Of course my definition of soft ground may be different to yours and I may be reading too much into your apparent plans.