aikmeam
Chemical
- Jun 3, 2003
- 20
Dear all,
Much has been said about the API's 2/3 rule (or the new 10/13 rule) for heat exchangers. And the discussion always resolves around high pressure and low pressure side.
But which sides are we talking about?
What's the likelihood, or credibility to consider tube rupture relief, when the low pressure is in the tube side?
What's the standard practice in determing the "broken" orifice area then? I've seen some company using the 5mm pinhole basis but where does that come from?
Much has been said about the API's 2/3 rule (or the new 10/13 rule) for heat exchangers. And the discussion always resolves around high pressure and low pressure side.
But which sides are we talking about?
What's the likelihood, or credibility to consider tube rupture relief, when the low pressure is in the tube side?
What's the standard practice in determing the "broken" orifice area then? I've seen some company using the 5mm pinhole basis but where does that come from?