Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations JAE on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Structural Engineer's Eye Candy

Status
Not open for further replies.

JAE

Structural
Joined
Jun 27, 2000
Messages
15,696
Location
US
You can visualize the load path. Very nice old bridge.

 
The riveters got pretty good at it after a while!
 
JAE, where is that? It's lovely!
 
The title says: Circa 1908. "Arch bridge, Bellows Falls, Vermont."

This photo is from
 
Nice one, JAE. The wikipedia article which Mike referenced says that it was a three-hinged arch, but I can't see a hinge at the top.
 
hokie66 - looks like Wikipedia needs a correction on that!

It says that this type of structure was used in Europe at that time. I can't think of any European arches of that type from as early as 1908.

Any suggestions?

Doug Jenkins
Interactive Design Services
 
This one in 1916 in the US, then the Tyne bridge, Bayonne Bridge and Sydney Harbour Bridge in early thirties. 1908? I don't know.
 
Guys, zoom in the the sign at the right portal; pretty hefty fine for back then!
 
Two more cool structures still in existance in the lovely town of Bellows Falls:

Rail Tunnel: 278' long rail tunnel which runs directly under downtown. I was involved with lowering the track (for the third time in the tunnels long history) in 2007. Cool project.


 
 http://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=bb5d06b2-689f-4872-a014-ebd0b59593e2&file=BFtunnel050911-1024.JPG
hokie,

The Wikipedia article goes on to say: "As a departure from a normal three-hinged arch, the design incorporates a compression joint in each arch instead of the third hinge. He apparently did this to provide a continuous visual curve through the arches."

BA
 
About the OP, does anyone else here feel that there seems to lack sufficient lateral stiffness of the deck?

Tacoma narrows anyone...

tg
 
hokie66,
I liked the Maria Pia Bridge. Very nice "feel" to it.

All of these bridges seem to give me a sense that the lateral resistance to wind (per trainguy's comment) sort of makes you wonder how the calculations would come out with today's wind provisions.

Perhaps the bridges, despite their "airy" look, had enough mass to simply counteract any Tacoma Narrows effects.

 
If you go on to read the Wiki article, the BF Arch Bridge did indeed suffer a near failure at the hands of lateral loading by ice in the flood of '36. Although that may have been an issue with the abutments.
 
BA,
I did read that, but would have to see the detail to be convinced that he had a real hinge. Perhaps he just assumed a hinge to make the analysis easier.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top