Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Standard for secondary dimensioning (in/mm or mm/in)

Status
Not open for further replies.

whippet

Mechanical
Joined
Jan 1, 2003
Messages
42
Location
US
Is there a standard that states where the secondary dimension is to be located in reference to the primary dimension? SolidWorks only gives the option of having the secondary dimension above or to the right of the primary dimension. As far as I know the secondary is to be below or to the right.
It just doesn’t make sense. If there is a standard (that follows common sense :o) It can quoted and submited as an enhancement. have fun make money
Paul
 
I know this is the ANSI forum, but I'm more familiar with MIL specs and thought I'd add my insight.

MIL-STD and DOD-STD do not allow dual dimensioning on drawing faces. If you need dual dimensions, you add another sheet with the conversions on it. So, whether or not the the secondary dimension is above, below, or after the primary is moot.

Since MIL-STD's are converting to ANSI/ASME, hopefully someone can enlighten the both of us.

--Scott
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top