Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Stair-landing reinforcing

Status
Not open for further replies.

ztengguy

Structural
May 11, 2011
708
Is there any benefit to having the reinforcing cross at the intersection, instead of just having the bars parallel and not individual bars?
 
 http://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=419336e5-dd36-46a8-9197-1351c90f7565&file=walls_reinforced_concrete_rc_shear_composite_stair_staircase_slabs_connection_murs_voile_beton_arme_treppe_muri_parete_di_taglio_cemento_armato_scala_Betontreppen_Betonnen_trap_design_betono_laiptai.png
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

There's a big benefit. If you used uninterrupted parallel bars, they'd pop out the bottom of the stair when the knuckle experienced opening (positive) moment.

The greatest trick that bond stress ever pulled was convincing the world it didn't exist.
 
KootK has explained the major reason. Another reason is that concrete cover will be compromised due to the bend radius.
 
I'd never considered the cover aspect before.

This won't apply directly here but I've seen typical details for parking ramps where parallel bars are allowed so long as the angular change is four degrees or less. I'm not sure if that's been verified rigorously somehow or if it's simply based on a lack of problems with past structures.

The greatest trick that bond stress ever pulled was convincing the world it didn't exist.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor