Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

STAAD Base plate with hole using FEM strange results

Status
Not open for further replies.
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Hi,

can you explain why are you using 0.4*60MPa as your modulus of subgrade reaction, are you not mixing up strength and stiffness?

When you say (in point 1) that it is not capturing a real behaviour, can you explain in what way?
 
I just assumed 0.4*60 as the bearing capacity of my concrete and that is strength.

Because the baseplate is sitting on concrete pier.

I am also not sure.

But I understand your point. If it is a soil then value of K would have to be Subgrade modulus / allowable displacement multiplied by influence area. But for this case can you correct me?

Because, if i run the analysis and take a look at support reactions it is not realistic. 2nd, the displacement if i animate, it is really not true.

But I cannot think of another way and what is i am missing.

It should'nt behave like that.

Actually this is my first time to do base plate on top of concrete pier. I just want to observe the extent of hole and see how it reacts with the stresses. Though I am confident that it shouldnt be an issue because it is outside the bearing area. But i just want to make sure and prove it.

what is your idea?

Regards,
E104909

 
I am not sure if it matters in why your results seem to be wrong, but Young's modulus of concrete is probably of the order tof 20,000N/mm2 .

I have no access to STAAD, so if you could post a sketch of your detail as well as screenshoot of your results where you can explain why are they wrong it would help.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor