Brandon
Civil/Environmental
- Oct 16, 2000
- 29
A friend's house has a garage with a concrete slab "roof" that is the floor of the living space above. House built probably in the 1920s. Most of the concrete cover has spalled off the slab soffit in lines following the rebar (orthogonal grid)and the rebar is obviously corroded. I haven't been over to see it yet, so from what I know at this point, the concrete is mostly intact around the perimeter of the slab near the supporting walls.
I'm going over to take a look and can post pictures later. I can get some measurements and probably even get a good idea of the thickness, then do the capacity calculations easy enough. But in terms of should this slab be repaired/strengthened my thinking is that as long as there is at least a development length of the bars surrounded by sound concrete at the supports, then the capacity of the slab should be mostly intact? In this case, the repair objective would be to simply protect the bars and prevent any further concrete spalling, rather than a full-scale strengthening and/or structural repair. Am I off base here?
I read a couple of technical papers that examined loss of bond of the tensile steel of reinforced concrete beams, and the conclusion was that the ultimate flexural capacity of the slab was only reduced about 15% even if the tensile steel had lost bond over 75% of it's length.
Thoughts/advice appreciated. Pictures to come.
I'm going over to take a look and can post pictures later. I can get some measurements and probably even get a good idea of the thickness, then do the capacity calculations easy enough. But in terms of should this slab be repaired/strengthened my thinking is that as long as there is at least a development length of the bars surrounded by sound concrete at the supports, then the capacity of the slab should be mostly intact? In this case, the repair objective would be to simply protect the bars and prevent any further concrete spalling, rather than a full-scale strengthening and/or structural repair. Am I off base here?
I read a couple of technical papers that examined loss of bond of the tensile steel of reinforced concrete beams, and the conclusion was that the ultimate flexural capacity of the slab was only reduced about 15% even if the tensile steel had lost bond over 75% of it's length.
Thoughts/advice appreciated. Pictures to come.