electricpete
Electrical
- May 4, 2001
- 16,774
Let's say I have a 1 mm solid copper conductor (assume conductivity 58 MS / m) carrying 10khz.
By two different means (finite element and copper conductor, I calculate the same skin effect resistance ratio: Rac / Rdc = 1.0068
Here is the finite element solution:
Here is an analytical solution based on a textbook.
I cannot come close to recreating that result using the Standard Handbook For Electrical Engineers (S.H.E.E.) formula in chapter 4 Table 4-2. Can anyone recreate this result using the SHEE? x should be around 1.l but I can't get that.
One thing I stumble over is the units. I notice they request resistivity in ab-ohm centimeters. That is a crazy unit even though it is defined their (ab-ohm = 1E-9 ohm). The annoying thing is they should either let us pick our our units or else tell us the units for all the variables but they don't. I guess it should be cgs ? (cm gives me that clue although ab-ohms doesn't). But I remember mu0 (and epsilon0 for that matter) in cgs are a little strange (I think that starting with SI mu0=4*piE-7 and applying unit conversions doesn't necessarily get you to cgs mu0). I tried it as mu0=1 but stilll didn't work.
What is the physical significance of this x parameter they use? If you work it out it has units like ohm-m (what is the physical significance).
Last gripe - Why the heck didn't they use a dimensionless formulation? I have a dimensionless solution in my pdf file – see the plot Rac/Rdc vs Rn where Rn = radius over skin depth. Should be very easy to enter the table using a simple argument and let the user pick his preferred units. And the argument has a very simple phsycial signficiance (radius as multiple of skin depth) instaed of some undefined x. Am I missing something?
=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.
By two different means (finite element and copper conductor, I calculate the same skin effect resistance ratio: Rac / Rdc = 1.0068
Here is the finite element solution:
Here is an analytical solution based on a textbook.
I cannot come close to recreating that result using the Standard Handbook For Electrical Engineers (S.H.E.E.) formula in chapter 4 Table 4-2. Can anyone recreate this result using the SHEE? x should be around 1.l but I can't get that.
One thing I stumble over is the units. I notice they request resistivity in ab-ohm centimeters. That is a crazy unit even though it is defined their (ab-ohm = 1E-9 ohm). The annoying thing is they should either let us pick our our units or else tell us the units for all the variables but they don't. I guess it should be cgs ? (cm gives me that clue although ab-ohms doesn't). But I remember mu0 (and epsilon0 for that matter) in cgs are a little strange (I think that starting with SI mu0=4*piE-7 and applying unit conversions doesn't necessarily get you to cgs mu0). I tried it as mu0=1 but stilll didn't work.
What is the physical significance of this x parameter they use? If you work it out it has units like ohm-m (what is the physical significance).
Last gripe - Why the heck didn't they use a dimensionless formulation? I have a dimensionless solution in my pdf file – see the plot Rac/Rdc vs Rn where Rn = radius over skin depth. Should be very easy to enter the table using a simple argument and let the user pick his preferred units. And the argument has a very simple phsycial signficiance (radius as multiple of skin depth) instaed of some undefined x. Am I missing something?
=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.