Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

shuttle valve piston Gtol

Status
Not open for further replies.

djhurayt

Mechanical
Jan 18, 2001
220
shuttle_valve_piston_uhvvd4.jpg


Any suggestions on how best to control the six ground diameters of a shuttle valve piston.
The perfect part would have:
1) all the diameters exactly the same
2) all the diameters concentric with each other

Thoughts:
1) let one end be datum A, the other datum B and a callout for total runout of each surface relative to A-B
2) continuous feature (but not sure of the details of how to apply)
3) one end be the a single datum and all other surface either controlled with total runout or true position

Not a lot of experience with multiple boss precision shafts and thought or direction appreciated

edit:
forgot to add ASME
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Something to consider:
ASME_implied_self_datum_my2u43.jpg


"For every expert there is an equal and opposite expert"
Arthur C. Clarke Profiles of the future
 
Thank you, that is the image I was looking for but could not find.

Is that from Alan Krulikowski's book (which I don't have with me)?
 
If as you say all 6x diameters ride together on the same surface, then I don't think choosing one or two of them as a datum feature to control the rest is a good idea, and it doesn't reflect design intent.

My vote would be for a continuous feature <CF> callout. Alternately control of coaxiality of the diameters could be achieved with something similar to Y14.5-2009 fig. 4-24 wtih position. I believe these two would achieve a very similar end result with minute differences.

Note that use of <CF> has been expanded in the 2018 version as the committee has realized it is a useful control.
 
Just to add to the case for <CF> in your application you may want to control form more tightly across all 6x diameters together (instead of individually), especially since they all presumably ride on the same surface. <CF> combined with cylindricity will allow you to do this, and I think its a better solution for your application than position.

Tec-Ease has a tip from the late Don Day which explains this, and is actually very similar to the part you included in your OP (shuttle valve).

Tec-Ease Tip Video Link
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor