PMR06
Structural
- Nov 3, 2005
- 433
Question: Per ACI R11.7.4.3, one can use mu=0.6 for shear resistance primarily due to dowel action of the reinforcement. Does the reinforcement still need to be developed on both sides? Is the 0.6 basically saying the dowels will be shearing (not in tension)?
Background: (See attached sketch) We have our typical housekeeping pad detail 6" tall concrete pad with #5 dowels w/ std hooks around the perimeter and a mat of #5's. We do have lateral load from equipment mounted above that needs to be transferred thru the pad into the foundation. My argument is that even if you used #3 dowels in our typical 6" pad, you cannot get ldh in the pad, thus you cannot develop the dowel, thus you cannot use shear friction. On the other hand, if you count on just the bars shearing (is that even valid), then you might get into side cover blowout appendix D issues...
Any thoughts, references, threads? Thanks in advance.
Background: (See attached sketch) We have our typical housekeeping pad detail 6" tall concrete pad with #5 dowels w/ std hooks around the perimeter and a mat of #5's. We do have lateral load from equipment mounted above that needs to be transferred thru the pad into the foundation. My argument is that even if you used #3 dowels in our typical 6" pad, you cannot get ldh in the pad, thus you cannot develop the dowel, thus you cannot use shear friction. On the other hand, if you count on just the bars shearing (is that even valid), then you might get into side cover blowout appendix D issues...
Any thoughts, references, threads? Thanks in advance.