To Rob Campbells' point, ask around for information on your potential Client. Many service providers call vendors I use to determine the character, integrity, seriousness, ethics, pay on time, can they pay for the project, ease of doing business with, etc. of potential Clients. I learned that by getting crosswise with a Client, my first.
I knew what I could deliver and negotiated the contract to my deliverables. They were responsible for the mechanical installation and wanted that to avoid paying an electrical contractor. They insisted that they were the original do-it-yourselfers. They insisted a lot of things about themselves.
As I got into the project, I heard from vendor after vendor that they were cheap, wanted discounts and not just any old discounts but large discounts, looked for freebies often, weren't serious about investing in their own company, etc. Red flag #1 but I didn't recognize it. I was accustomed to large companies complaining about the investments in the company so it was normal to me.
Red flag #2: They didn't want to do the mechanical installation and asked me to do it, which I did and at my cost because they complained about the quote from the contractor. The project was already behind schedule because they were not doing their part so I sucked it up to be a good engineering company and keep the project moving forward. I learned I can function as a GC. I learned I need to not function as a GC at my cost.
Red flag #3: Within a month of contract signing, they changed the scope.
Red flag #4: They had
no business processes and were running their company more blindly than I realized.
Red flag #5: They have
trust problems.
Ultimately, because I was running behind schedule we got into a contract dispute, which was never repaired. They threatened to sue me over a litany of problems, which were false. I had to take it seriously because they're much, much bigger than me and have a high powered law firm, which sent me nasty letters. I interviewed several attorneys and walked in with a notebook of reports, emails, invoices, etc., which had been provided to my Client every step of the way. All of the attorneys had some choice words, choice observations, and advice except the one I hired. The one I hired told me what I looked like, at first glance. That was a useful perspective and I appreciated his honesty. As he became familiar with the case, he began issuing choice words, choice observations, and advice, which sounded familiar. Some of the attorneys offered the observation that I had been bullied each step of the way. Interestingly, a college friend said the same thing.
Each attorney said there are good companies and bad companies. I had run into a bad company. When I defended my Client, each attorney emphatically replied that they are bad people, a bad company, and I need to identify the good ones and leave the bad ones alone. Good companies are interested in investing in their business and their suppliers. They don't push for discounts and, when problems arise, they fully support and work through problems with their suppliers. They understand their suppliers are there to help them make their businesses better and cannot work for little or nothing and don't expect them to do so. They believe in everyone making a fair profit. They said to never go into that plant again because they'll just run over me again. If they do it once, they will do it again. These were experienced attorneys saying these things.
My former Client called a supplier of mine for all emails, POs, invoices, etc. My supplier refused because that is a breach of ethics and the contracts were with my company. That call sent shock waves throughout management, in my supplier, and I had phone calls and emails from more than one person alerting me. My former Client wanted a recommendation for another company to finish the project, from that supplier, who didn't want to provide one. Their reasoning, "Look what they did to you. What could we say? They did it to you; they'll do it to someone else. We cannot send another company in there knowing what they did to you." That was a new lesson for me, too. Ask! Vendors are more than willing to tell, if they know.
The sad aspect of the POs, invoices, etc. was that my Client had all of that anyway and didn't understand what they had. They hired a CFO, with little experience, who didn't understand the documentation I had given them either. I was shocked at their ignorance. They had such trust problems I volunteered to be completely transparent. I didn't think it mattered but I learned, at the end, it does matter. I will never be transparent again.
When I read Character Disturbance by George Simon, Ph.D., I saw my former Clients and understood then what each attorney had told me and what I had been up against. It pays to understand human behavior, yours and others'. That experience is another reason I highly recommend people read Character Disturbance. It is accurate and good knowledge to have.
It is good to understand what kind of reputation one is building with each interaction. I warned my former Client about that but it was not understood or well received. The experience provides another background view of what goes on in business.
Pamela K. Quillin, P.E.
Quillin Engineering, LLC
NSPE-CO, Central Chapter
Dinner program: