Philip.screw
Structural
- Jan 4, 2024
- 9
My firm is working on several projects where we have steel braced frame or moment frame on top of concrete piers. In one of our projects, we have a steel braced frame (OCBF) on a 6ft tall pier connecting it to the footings. I am in a high seismic region as well.
I am reviewing ACI318-19 to see what the design and reinforcement requirements for these piers are and I'm having trouble finding the right section. Chapter 18.13 does not seem to have much guidance for piers as a foundation element. I could design them with the pile requirements, but that does not feel correct as a spread footing is my foundation.
I talked to some of my co-workers and we think they should either be designed as a concrete special moment frame column. Our reasoning is we think the piers are considered members not designated as part of the SFRS. Section 18.14.3.2 (b) says "(b) Columns shall satisfy 18.7.4.1 and 18.7.6." which are the section for long. and transverse reinforcement of a SMF column.
Is our thought process reasonable? Or is there another section of ACI that other engineers use for their piers with seismic design and forces.
I am reviewing ACI318-19 to see what the design and reinforcement requirements for these piers are and I'm having trouble finding the right section. Chapter 18.13 does not seem to have much guidance for piers as a foundation element. I could design them with the pile requirements, but that does not feel correct as a spread footing is my foundation.
I talked to some of my co-workers and we think they should either be designed as a concrete special moment frame column. Our reasoning is we think the piers are considered members not designated as part of the SFRS. Section 18.14.3.2 (b) says "(b) Columns shall satisfy 18.7.4.1 and 18.7.6." which are the section for long. and transverse reinforcement of a SMF column.
Is our thought process reasonable? Or is there another section of ACI that other engineers use for their piers with seismic design and forces.