Mccoy
Geotechnical
- Nov 9, 2000
- 907
Colleagues,
sesmic behaviour of soil is presently a hot topic in Italy and Europe in general, as specific state codes and regulations are being issued on the wake of Eurocode7 and Eurocode8.
I was researching methods for seismic evaluation of bearing capacity and settlements, and the classic publication appears to be Richard, Elms and Budhu, 1993.
This is also reported on Das' "Shallow foundations".
Interestingly enough, settlements are calculated without the use of elastic modulus in the input.
Also, more method are available in the literature, some focusing on the loss of bearing capacity due to the inclination of load resultant during seismic events.
My question is:
has anyone of you guys any practical experience in the application of Richards et al relations (I'm particularly interested in settlements - alas, Das' book has no closed-form solution, only those hateful graphs).
And has the method been overpassed by more recent and updated studies (even though I'm not aware of other studies on settlements in seismic conditions, except something on USACE using penetrometric data).
Or maybe such methods just don't work too good in practice?
sesmic behaviour of soil is presently a hot topic in Italy and Europe in general, as specific state codes and regulations are being issued on the wake of Eurocode7 and Eurocode8.
I was researching methods for seismic evaluation of bearing capacity and settlements, and the classic publication appears to be Richard, Elms and Budhu, 1993.
This is also reported on Das' "Shallow foundations".
Interestingly enough, settlements are calculated without the use of elastic modulus in the input.
Also, more method are available in the literature, some focusing on the loss of bearing capacity due to the inclination of load resultant during seismic events.
My question is:
has anyone of you guys any practical experience in the application of Richards et al relations (I'm particularly interested in settlements - alas, Das' book has no closed-form solution, only those hateful graphs).
And has the method been overpassed by more recent and updated studies (even though I'm not aware of other studies on settlements in seismic conditions, except something on USACE using penetrometric data).
Or maybe such methods just don't work too good in practice?