Eng-Tips is the largest forum for Engineering Professionals on the Internet.

Members share and learn making Eng-Tips Forums the best source of engineering information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations dmapguru on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Rip Rap (ice)

Status
Not open for further replies.

SMIAH

Civil/Environmental
Joined
Jan 26, 2009
Messages
482
Location
CA
I did a study to evaluate rip rap size to be put in a small stream to protect the slopes against erosion caused by the velocity of flow during floods.

So I did some calculation with HEC RAS to find the velocity during the peak flow (10-year). Doing so, and using the Corps of Engineer relationship (1991), the diameter size (D50) has to be = 6 inches (i.e. the velocity is relatively small in the stream as the flow is subcritical).

Then I know that the ice cover is approximately 20 inches right now on the stream and this is quite representative of the mean annual ice cover depth. I think that USACE's recommandation is to use a rip rap with a D100 = 2x(ice cover).

This would make the rip rap size very large.

Anything I'm missing?
 
For information this is from Guide to Bridge Hydraulics (2004) :

"It has been suggested that in severe conditions stones should have a diameter at least equal to the ice thickness. Another course of action is to design the rock sizes using conventionnal open water criteria, monitor the works for ice damage after construction, and undertake maintenance or upgrading if required. The amount of damage likely to occur in a single event is comparatively small"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top