I would prefer Rational on the site you described, I can't see unit hydrograph extrapolation for such a small site with so much impervious. But use what the reviewer wants, as that is the only opinion which will matter. I agree with most of the others, unless you are in the desert, that intensity is very low for storage volume inflow. Regardless of methodology, you must weight your coefficients (curve numbers in SCS) first...use .95 for impervious, around .25 for grass and .3 for woods. Cw for the site will be much lower than 0.95.
Use intensity if you are using the Rational Method and decrease amount for longer Tc. Here in southeastern PA, intensity ranges from 4.2 in/hr for 2yr to 8.2 in/hr for 100yr storms, at 5 minutes Tc.
If you go with SCS methods (TR20 of TR55), use 24hr rainfall amount, not intensity. Here, it ranges from 2.5 inches for 2yr to 7 inches for 100yr event. This amount will adjust itself by using the program algorithms; don't decrease them yourself.