rittz
Structural
- Dec 30, 2007
- 200
I often debate with myself …. I have used two methods to resist thrust at the base of rigid frame steel buildings when using a foundation of cast-in-place-concrete piles and grade beams with grade supported slab: 1. Thrust rods under the slab (slab isolated from grade beam) and 2.Hairpin bars in the slab (slab doweled to grade beam). Battered piles are more appropriate for larger spans. The subject buildings are typically 100 x 200 x 18 + high ….wide open shops with perhaps an office area and/or an area of mezzanine.
What comments would anyone have? In some cases we are dealing with highly plastic clay. We would always use void form under the grade beam. But what about heave pressures on the slab? Does that make doweling slab-to-grade beam ill advised? Slip joints at partitions seem to be essential for one thing as heave anywhere from 1” to 4” is experienced in clay depending on plasticity of the clay sub soil. Replacing a meter or so of the soil beneath the slab and replacing with granular is an option
What comments would anyone have? In some cases we are dealing with highly plastic clay. We would always use void form under the grade beam. But what about heave pressures on the slab? Does that make doweling slab-to-grade beam ill advised? Slip joints at partitions seem to be essential for one thing as heave anywhere from 1” to 4” is experienced in clay depending on plasticity of the clay sub soil. Replacing a meter or so of the soil beneath the slab and replacing with granular is an option