pelelo
Geotechnical
- Aug 10, 2009
- 357
Engineers,
I am in involved in a proposal related to a geotechnical investigation for a proposed generator which will be supported on a 10 ft by 20 ft slab on grade. Strata is sand in the top 60 ft. Water table is around 10 ft below grade.
Using the reference of Stress distribution by Boussinesq, the engineer in charge recommended 1 boring 40 ft deep (2 x 20 ft= 40 ft)(assuming 0.1q is at 2B for square footings, he picked B as the largest side to be safe).
Other engineers understand that a boring is not needed, instead 1 or 2 hand augers, 5 to 10 ft deep are enough. The reason for this is because the load of the generator is too low (~200 psf), so they undertand that 200 psf is nothing therefore by hand augering is more that enough.
What do you think?
In my opinion, the stress distribution is independent of the load of the structure. What drives the stress distribution is the dimension of the footing or the slab. I still think that the approach of using 1 boring is appropriate.
I am in involved in a proposal related to a geotechnical investigation for a proposed generator which will be supported on a 10 ft by 20 ft slab on grade. Strata is sand in the top 60 ft. Water table is around 10 ft below grade.
Using the reference of Stress distribution by Boussinesq, the engineer in charge recommended 1 boring 40 ft deep (2 x 20 ft= 40 ft)(assuming 0.1q is at 2B for square footings, he picked B as the largest side to be safe).
Other engineers understand that a boring is not needed, instead 1 or 2 hand augers, 5 to 10 ft deep are enough. The reason for this is because the load of the generator is too low (~200 psf), so they undertand that 200 psf is nothing therefore by hand augering is more that enough.
What do you think?
In my opinion, the stress distribution is independent of the load of the structure. What drives the stress distribution is the dimension of the footing or the slab. I still think that the approach of using 1 boring is appropriate.