DDP20
Chemical
- Jul 7, 2020
- 2
Hello,
Currently working on sizing a PSV for a pressurized water vessel, I would like to consult the members of the community for help and advice.
Fluid = Water
P_op = 22 barg
T_op = 170°C
P_PSV = 28 barg
Accumulation = 10%
Outlet: to ATM
Maximum Back Pressure = 0.1 barg
For the closed outlet case, I have to evacuate 83 tons/h via the PSV. I initially applied the single phase method for Liquids as per API520, 9th Edition, pargraph 5.8. The result was 1.5G3. I then looked at the project's line sizing criteria and found DN100 at inlet and DN600 at outlet (factor of 6!) which brings me to my first question, is it common to have such a configuration in the industry?
I then realized that the water will flash across the PSV hence I am now on the maximum mass flux method (API520, Annex C). The result I obtain once I've applied a discharge coefficient Kd of 0.65 is 5.44 cm2. As per API526, an appropriate size would be at least 2J3 or 3J4. In this case, my upstream line is DN150 and downstream line, still DN600. I would've expected a much greater orifice size with the maximum mass flux method. Perhaps, I am missing something.
Thank you for your time,
Derek
Currently working on sizing a PSV for a pressurized water vessel, I would like to consult the members of the community for help and advice.
Fluid = Water
P_op = 22 barg
T_op = 170°C
P_PSV = 28 barg
Accumulation = 10%
Outlet: to ATM
Maximum Back Pressure = 0.1 barg
For the closed outlet case, I have to evacuate 83 tons/h via the PSV. I initially applied the single phase method for Liquids as per API520, 9th Edition, pargraph 5.8. The result was 1.5G3. I then looked at the project's line sizing criteria and found DN100 at inlet and DN600 at outlet (factor of 6!) which brings me to my first question, is it common to have such a configuration in the industry?
I then realized that the water will flash across the PSV hence I am now on the maximum mass flux method (API520, Annex C). The result I obtain once I've applied a discharge coefficient Kd of 0.65 is 5.44 cm2. As per API526, an appropriate size would be at least 2J3 or 3J4. In this case, my upstream line is DN150 and downstream line, still DN600. I would've expected a much greater orifice size with the maximum mass flux method. Perhaps, I am missing something.
Thank you for your time,
Derek