Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Protected versus unprotected manholes and wetwells

Status
Not open for further replies.

tigerbob

Civil/Environmental
Joined
Dec 12, 2001
Messages
8
Location
US
Does anyone know of any reseach on the effects of coal-tar epoxy from acid attach on sewer manholes and wetwells? We've had an engineer ask us for reccommendations on standard unprotected manholes vs. Coal-tar vs. mechanical liners. I know that the mechanical liners are the best protection and highest cost, but my main concern is unprotected vs. the coal tar.

tigerbob
 
Coal tar or Koppers( trademark) is a good coating for RCP if it is applied at the factory. I haven't found a good coating that is applied to existing structures. although some people swear by them. Go to the Trenchless online site for a list of the coating companies.
 
We are designers and makers of sewer valves, covers and frames. We have found that most 2 part epoxy resins are cost effective for valve bodies but rely on bitumen product for the underside of covers. Ductile iron with a triple coat has had the test of time with acceptable results - however, grey iron is more porous and will have faster breakdown following paint coat loss.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top