tr6
Mechanical
- Oct 2, 2002
- 81
When evaluating a flange, using the Kellogg Peq method for piping loads, there is no mention on how to handle an axial force that is compressive.
Caesar takes the axial piping load as an absolute value, and uses it in the evaluation formula. This seems to add an additional layer of conservatism to the whole Peq evaluation process.
I have seen pipe stress specs that will not let you take credit for a "compressive" stress. In those cases of a compressive force, the force is not included in the Peq evaluation.
So, if the axial force is compressive:
1.Is the sign of the force to be taken into account and result in being subtracted from the bending force?
2. Taken as the absolute value and added to the bending force?
3. Not taken into account at all resulting in the Peq analysis being based on the bending forces only?
I suppose these questions also apply if a flange is evaluated per ASME VIII, Appendix 2 for piping loads. ???
Caesar takes the axial piping load as an absolute value, and uses it in the evaluation formula. This seems to add an additional layer of conservatism to the whole Peq evaluation process.
I have seen pipe stress specs that will not let you take credit for a "compressive" stress. In those cases of a compressive force, the force is not included in the Peq evaluation.
So, if the axial force is compressive:
1.Is the sign of the force to be taken into account and result in being subtracted from the bending force?
2. Taken as the absolute value and added to the bending force?
3. Not taken into account at all resulting in the Peq analysis being based on the bending forces only?
I suppose these questions also apply if a flange is evaluated per ASME VIII, Appendix 2 for piping loads. ???