Eng-Tips is the largest forum for Engineering Professionals on the Internet.

Members share and learn making Eng-Tips Forums the best source of engineering information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations JStephen on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Powerfactory zero sequence voltage calculation

Status
Not open for further replies.

Electrical1948

Electrical
Joined
Apr 18, 2015
Messages
18
Location
NL
Hi all,

I was refreshing my symmetrical components theory and performed a calculation in Power factory (Digsilent) to compare against my calculations in Excel. I got all of the figures correct, however I am unable to calculate a zero sequence voltage component "through" a transformer.

The input data are as follows:
Operating voltage (Grid): UAN = 230 V <0 deg, UBN = 235 V < -120 deg, UCN = 240 V <120 deg

Transformer:
Rated voltage HV winding: 400V
Rated voltage LV winding: 400 V
Vector group: Dy11

I calculate the following symmetrical components on the HV side:
U+ = 235 <0 deg
U- = 2.887 < -150 deg
U0 = 2.887 < 150 deg

I calculate the following symmetrical components on the LV side:
U+ = 235 <30 deg
U- = 2.887 < 180 deg

I can't calculate U0 since I do not have the phase to neutral voltages. However, Powerfactory calculates U0 = 1.443 < 60 deg, which I do not understand.

Is there anyone who can explain how the U0 is calculated by Powerfactory?
 
If we recalculate the Delta phase-to-phase voltages using voltages phase-to-neutral the absolute value is not 400 V but 402.7 AB, 411.4 BC and 407 CA. That means the phase-to-neutral voltages are different.
If Powerfactory software may approximate these different phasor values in order to reach a symmetrical 400 V Delta may be the Uo could be different.
I did myself an approximation changing only absolute value of the phase-to-neutral phasors and I got Uo=1.45 <150o.
 
Hi

Thanks for the reply.

Can you show how you did the approximation to get U0=1.45?
 
First, I calculated the primary phase-to-phase angle and I took for secondary phase-to-neutral the same angle[see the sketch].
Then I calculated the secondary phase-to-phase voltage using these phase-to-neutral secondary voltages, changing the absolute value -only-in order to create a symmetrical 400 V secondary system.
However, since I did not save the calculation, and I did not remember
the changed absolute values I did another turn of changes, but it still not as the latter.Dyn11.jpgDyn11 calculations.jpg
Now I got Uosecondary=1.709<54.6o only.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top