strguy11
Structural
- Nov 29, 2005
- 233
For projects with unbonded, monostrand tendons in buildings, the PTI manual and ACI indicates that the measured field elongations shall be within 7% of the calculated elongations.
My question is that are these compared to the elongations using the theoretical E and Area of the tendons, or should those be revised based on actual E and A based on the mill certifications?
The shop drawings have the elongations based on the theoretical E and A. I guess the question is does the 7% tolerance account for the variations in the E and A, or should these be accounted for, then checked for the 7%?
My question is that are these compared to the elongations using the theoretical E and Area of the tendons, or should those be revised based on actual E and A based on the mill certifications?
The shop drawings have the elongations based on the theoretical E and A. I guess the question is does the 7% tolerance account for the variations in the E and A, or should these be accounted for, then checked for the 7%?