dm3415
Structural
- Sep 27, 2007
- 50
I'm in a debate right now with a software manufacturer, my stand is that the ASCE Omega overstrength factor is not applicable to finding a 1.5 or 1.3 factor of safety for overturning of a foundation.
Generally it's my contention that overstrength is only applied where specifically stated in the IBC/ASCE and not the default applied factor. I know Overstrength has been discussed at length on this forum and we don't need to rehash that, I know it is required when you have a slab supporting an irregularity.
I just want to find documentation and/or confirmation from my peers that specifically eliminates the use of overstrength from overturning. I've looked through FEMA 750 already too.
Generally it's my contention that overstrength is only applied where specifically stated in the IBC/ASCE and not the default applied factor. I know Overstrength has been discussed at length on this forum and we don't need to rehash that, I know it is required when you have a slab supporting an irregularity.
I just want to find documentation and/or confirmation from my peers that specifically eliminates the use of overstrength from overturning. I've looked through FEMA 750 already too.