Jul 2, 2019 #1 R1chJC Marine/Ocean Joined Apr 15, 2015 Messages 51 Location GB Hi All, I'm looking at a drawing the below call-out on a hole - doesn't seem to make sense to me.. Isn't the first row redundant since you get that same control as part of the Position tolerance row anyway? Datum feature A is a face perpendicular to the hole.
Hi All, I'm looking at a drawing the below call-out on a hole - doesn't seem to make sense to me.. Isn't the first row redundant since you get that same control as part of the Position tolerance row anyway? Datum feature A is a face perpendicular to the hole.
Jul 2, 2019 #2 chez311 Automotive Joined Mar 24, 2015 Messages 1,426 Location US Yes, the perpendicularity should be a refinement of position if both are specified. In your case it is redundant. Upvote 0 Downvote
Yes, the perpendicularity should be a refinement of position if both are specified. In your case it is redundant.
Jul 2, 2019 #3 Belanger Automotive Joined Oct 5, 2009 Messages 2,450 Location US And if someone will be revising the print, you should probably have them add a diameter symbol before each of those numbers (which are very small numbers, by the way!). John-Paul Belanger Certified Sr. GD&T Professional Geometric Learning Systems Upvote 0 Downvote
And if someone will be revising the print, you should probably have them add a diameter symbol before each of those numbers (which are very small numbers, by the way!). John-Paul Belanger Certified Sr. GD&T Professional Geometric Learning Systems