JohnnnyBoy
Structural
- Oct 13, 2015
- 81
I'm a new graduate and having a little difficulty understanding frames under bending and compression forces.
I'm currently working on a 31' tall building, in several section there is a second floor although there are many section where there would be no intermediate bracing. The building is a steel building on piles. When i'm designing a member for compressive forces I can use the Cr for flexural buckling under axial compression. On the other hand for bending I could consider the column to act like a beam and calculate my moment resistance that way. This method would also include calculation for lateral torsional bucking because I no longer have bracing from floor joists. Now using equation 13.8.2 it talks about members resisting both bending moments and axial compression, and the equation is as follows.:
Cf/Cr+0.85*U1x*Mfx/Mrx+B*U1y*Mfy/Mry <= 1.0
So would I calculate both the way I described above and make sure the column follows the above equation and consider the beam adequate?
I'm from Canada and using the cisc Handbook of Steel construction.
Furthermore I then models the structure using Etabs, and most of the columns were outputing W18x733 sections, which is grossly too strong for this type of structure and still failing the section. I looked into it a bit and found its using a K value for the columns as something around 24. Now from my understanding for a structure like this the base is a pinned connection and the top is free for moving but moment free and would therefore have a K-value of 2.
If someone could point me in the right direction to solve this it would be greatly appreciated.
I'm currently working on a 31' tall building, in several section there is a second floor although there are many section where there would be no intermediate bracing. The building is a steel building on piles. When i'm designing a member for compressive forces I can use the Cr for flexural buckling under axial compression. On the other hand for bending I could consider the column to act like a beam and calculate my moment resistance that way. This method would also include calculation for lateral torsional bucking because I no longer have bracing from floor joists. Now using equation 13.8.2 it talks about members resisting both bending moments and axial compression, and the equation is as follows.:
Cf/Cr+0.85*U1x*Mfx/Mrx+B*U1y*Mfy/Mry <= 1.0
So would I calculate both the way I described above and make sure the column follows the above equation and consider the beam adequate?
I'm from Canada and using the cisc Handbook of Steel construction.
Furthermore I then models the structure using Etabs, and most of the columns were outputing W18x733 sections, which is grossly too strong for this type of structure and still failing the section. I looked into it a bit and found its using a K value for the columns as something around 24. Now from my understanding for a structure like this the base is a pinned connection and the top is free for moving but moment free and would therefore have a K-value of 2.
If someone could point me in the right direction to solve this it would be greatly appreciated.