Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Log cabin Seismic design 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

GVCivilGuy

Civil/Environmental
Jun 4, 2007
17
Switching over to the new code (CBC2007 VS UBC 1997). What seismic response modification coefficient (R) should I use for a bearing wall system that is designed out of logs? I can't find anything in the ASCE7-05.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Most log cabins are not a true bearing wall system in that the loads are transmitted through the logs in bending to the intersecting corners. Many have gaps between the logs, but some do not. That being said, with the rods and spikes to transfer the lateral shear between the logs, and the rods to serve as holddowns, I just design them as a shearwall system.

In reality, if you model them on the computer, you could rationalize that they are really log moment frame systems with the rods and load bearing points serving as couples to develop the moment.

To keep things simple, I just use 6 or 6.5 for R (ASCE& or IBC). Never had my analysis questioned in ten years of doing them. Maybe because plans checkers really don't understand these animals very well?

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor