Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Level Gauge Slection criterion

Status
Not open for further replies.

scada31

Electrical
Mar 23, 2007
4
In a separator vacum,for oil/water interface measurement it is suitable LG type reflex or transparent and the number of connextion minimum two or three connection required for this case.
Best regards
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Hi!

You cannot use reflex type LG for liquid/liquid interface (also ref API 551 3.3.3.1). As the reflex type is based on reflection of the actual level, you cannot spot the actual interface bewteen oil/water (if required). So you should select the transparent type.
Regarding number of connections (several sections?) is all depending on your service.

Bonetti ( provides some excellent LG's.
 
Hi
Thank you for your response,I will choose transparent type as per your recommendation, but the number of connection it is required only tow for oil/water interface measurement in the outlet of a separtor vessel?
ragards
 
Hi,

For oil/water interface, magnetic level gauges will only give you the level of the combined volume, so you cannot spot the actual interface between oil/water.
For installation, various companies have various standards. TOTAL for instance has a maximum distance C-C on 2000mm. If longer range is needed, then several gauges are used, with an overlap on at least 50mm (visible). However, if the application is rather "nice", it can for sure be a longer gauge - but you might run into problems when aligning the upper/lower nozzle. Additional support might also be necessary.
 
Hi
Thank you for your comment,
I tray to used tow LG between the vessel nozzele,
regards
 
Hi all,

I think for measuring interface, it will be better to use capacitive level transmitter or radar type
 
If you use an armored gage use a weld-pad gage that welds directly to the wall of the vessel so it becomes more of an observation window. A remote-chamber gage can have a different interface level in it than exists in the main vessel. (gage)height of lower liquid x SG + height of lighter liquid x SG=(vessel) height of lower liquid x SG + height of lighter liquid x SG. There is not a unique solution. If you extrapolate the above equation for a gas interface too, you will see that even the liquid/gas interface might be different in the gage than in the vessel.

Radar will only see the liquid/gas interface, not a liquid/liquid interface.

A very carefully weighted float that floats on the lower liquid but sinks in the lighter liquid, driving a mechanical sensor, might be the most reliable way to deal with this.
 
For water oil interface, the Agar interface probe is good.


We are using these on our treaters.

"Do not worry about your problems with mathematics, I assure you mine are far greater."
Albert Einstein
Have you read FAQ731-376 to make the best use of Eng-Tips Forums?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor